Elvina Kalieva vs Ellie Schoppe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Success: Over the past six months, Schoppe has secured 37.77% of their second serve points, slightly less effective than Kalieva's 39.22%.
• Return Game Analysis: Schoppe has been slightly better at winning 51.59% of second serve return points compared to Kalieva's 51.57%, while Kalieva leads in first serve returns at 34.87% versus Schoppe's 31.99%.
• Pressure Handling: Is saving breakpoints a crucial stat? Schoppe excels, saving 52.29% of breakpoints, ahead of Kalieva's 47.97%.
• Match Win Percentage: In the past year, Schoppe has slightly outperformed Kalieva by winning 53.85% of their matches, compared to Kalieva’s 50%.
• Surface Preferences: Schoppe shows notable strength on Hard courts with a 65% win rate, while Kalieva performs best on Clay at 57%.
• Event Level Competition: Kalieva has a higher match win rate at ITF/Challenger events, winning 52.31% over Schoppe's 42.86%.
• Opponent Ranking: Over the last year, Schoppe faced opponents with an average rank of 387.85, compared to Kalieva's stronger average opponent rank of 311.63.
• Deciding Set Performance: Interested in decisive set outcomes? Kalieva holds the edge with a 47% win rate in deciding sets versus Schoppe’s 39%.
• Break Point Conversion: Kalieva has converted more of her breakpoint chances at 46.95%, outshining Schoppe’s 39.19% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the upcoming match between Schoppe and Kalieva, several statistics offer insight into potential outcomes. Kalieva has exhibited a marginal advantage in second serve performance and first serve return points, suggesting a slightly stronger foundational game.

Although Schoppe demonstrates proficiency in defending against breakpoints, Kalieva's superior breakpoint conversion may prove pivotal in pressure situations. Additionally, considering both players’ win percentages on their preferred surfaces and opponent caliber, Kalieva's historical edge on clay courts and experience against higher-ranked adversaries could play crucial roles.

When the match extends to a deciding set, Kalieva's higher success rate indicates a greater resilience in tightly contested scenarios. Given these factors, the balance slightly favors Kalieva as the likely winner of the upcoming match.